Is Your Fundraising Event Worth It? How to Find the Real ROI

Intermediate, Measuring Results

By Jeremy Reis

Ask most nonprofits how their gala did and you’ll hear one number: what it grossed. “We raised $95,000!” goes in the board report, the staff gets a well-deserved thank-you, and planning for next year starts in February.

Gross revenue is the least useful number an event produces. It doesn’t tell you what the event cost, what your team gave up to run it, or whether any of the people in the room will ever give again. Those are the numbers that tell you whether the event is worth doing.

This article walks through how to calculate the real return on a fundraising event, using a hypothetical gala, and how to decide what to do once you see the result. You don’t need to cancel your event. You do need to know what it’s actually buying you.

Why the usual event benchmark flatters you

The most cited benchmark for event costs comes from James Greenfield, whose reasonable cost guidelines put “activities, benefits, and special events” at about $0.50 per $1.00 raised. That makes events one of the more expensive ways to raise money on his list, behind only direct mail acquisition. Renewal mail, foundation, and corporate fundraising all come in around $0.20 to $0.25.

Here’s the part most people miss. Greenfield’s event figure is footnoted “gross revenue and direct costs only.” Direct costs are the invoices: venue, catering, AV, printing. They don’t include the hours your development director, executive director, and program staff spent on the event. Greenfield’s own note says that to get bottom-line costs, you need to add the indirect and overhead expenses and subtract them from gross revenue.

So if your event comes in at $0.30 per dollar on direct costs, you haven’t beaten the benchmark. You’ve measured something smaller than the benchmark assumes you’ll eventually measure.

Run the numbers on a typical gala

Imagine a youth mentoring nonprofit with a $1.2 million budget and a development team of three. Its annual gala looks like this:

Revenue Amount
200 tickets at $150 $30,000
Sponsorships $25,000
Silent auction $18,000
Paddle raise $22,000
Gross revenue $95,000

Direct costs: catering and venue at $85 per guest ($17,000), AV ($3,500), printing and décor ($2,500), auction items the organization bought ($1,500), and event software ($1,000). That’s $25,500.

On direct costs alone, the event cost about $0.27 to raise each dollar and netted $69,500. Most boards would call that a success.

Now add staff time. Count every hour from the first planning meeting to the last thank-you note: the development director, the coordinator who handled logistics, the executive director’s time recruiting sponsors and table hosts, the program staff who prepared the client story. Say it adds up to 700 hours. At a loaded cost of $45 an hour (salary plus benefits and payroll taxes), that’s $31,500.

Total cost: $57,000. Real net: $38,000. Real cost per dollar raised: $0.60.

That’s a different event. It’s still raising money. But $38,000 for 700 hours of staff time works out to about $54 of net revenue per hour.

If you don’t track staff time, don’t let that stop you. Have each person who worked on the event estimate their hours in a 15-minute conversation the week after. An honest estimate is far better than leaving the line blank.

The question gross revenue hides: how much of this money is new?

The next step is uncomfortable, and it’s the one that matters most. Go through the revenue line by line and ask: would we have received this money without the event?

In many small shops, the sponsors are businesses that already support the organization. The paddle raise is often led by board members and loyal donors who would have given a year-end gift anyway. If a donor who usually gives $2,000 in December gives $2,000 at your gala instead, the event didn’t raise that money. It moved it, at a cost.

You won’t get a perfect answer here, and you don’t need one. A rough split is enough. If half of your paddle raise came from people who already give at that level, the event’s real contribution is smaller than the total suggests.

Events still earn their place, if they do a specific job

None of this means events are a bad idea. They can do things a letter can’t. They put prospects in a room with your mission. They give board members an easy invitation to extend to friends. They can be the first step in a relationship with someone who later becomes a major donor.

But that only happens if somebody follows up. Bloomerang’s analysis of event costs makes the point that events tend to work best as a major donor cultivation tool, with a plan for moving attendees toward ongoing giving before, during, and after the night itself. Without that plan, you’ve thrown a nice party.

So measure the job you say the event is doing. If the event exists to find new donors, count new donors:

  • How many guests were new to your database?
  • How many of them gave again within 12 months?
  • How many had a one-on-one conversation with staff or a board member after the event?

Back to our gala. Suppose 80 of the 200 guests were new names, and nine of them made another gift in the next year. That’s about 11%. You might decide that’s acceptable for a cultivation event. You might decide it’s a sign the follow-up isn’t happening. Either way, you’re now discussing the right number. (If you want to put a dollar value on those nine donors, the approach in how to calculate donor lifetime value works well here.)

Don’t forget the ticket isn’t all gift

One more thing affects how you report event revenue and how you talk to guests. When someone pays $150 for a ticket that includes an $85 dinner, only $65 is a charitable contribution. The IRS treats this as a quid pro quo contribution. For any payment over $75 where the donor receives goods or services, you must give the donor a written statement with a good faith estimate of the value of what they received and explaining that only the amount above that value is deductible. The penalty is $10 per contribution, up to $5,000 per event or mailing.

This is easy to get right if you plan for it: put the fair market value on the ticket page and in the receipt. Your event receipt is also one of the few pieces of mail a new guest will definitely open, so it’s worth making it do more than meet the rule. (Your gift receipt may be the most-read letter you send has ideas.)

Three decisions you can make with the real numbers

Once you have net revenue with staff time, new-money estimates, and new-donor follow-up rates, you’re in a position to make a real decision. I’d look at it this way:

Keep it and fix the follow-up. If the event brings in a meaningful number of new people but few become donors, the problem is probably what happens on Monday morning. Assign every new guest to a staff member or board member for a personal follow-up within two weeks.

Keep it and shrink it. If the event mostly moves money from existing donors, consider a smaller, cheaper format: a reception at a board member’s home, a site visit, or an intimate dinner for 30. You may keep most of the revenue and give back hundreds of staff hours.

Replace it. If the net per staff hour is low, the new-donor numbers are thin, and your team dreads it, test what those hours could do elsewhere. For many small shops, 700 hours spent on personal visits and calls with existing donors is worth testing against the gala.

That last option is the hardest to raise with a board that loves its event. Bring the numbers, not an opinion, and frame it as a test, not a cancellation.

Where to start this week

Pull the final numbers from your most recent event. Add up the direct costs, then ask each person who worked on it to estimate their hours. Calculate your net revenue with staff time included, and divide it by the total hours.

Then pull the list of guests who were new to your database and check how many have given since. Those two numbers will tell you more about your event than anything in last year’s board report.

If you’re planning your next event and want to know what guests thought, these 10 post-event survey questions are a good companion to the numbers.